How to Read Better
  • How to Read
  • The End(s) of Reading
    • Reading Failure Modes
  • We've Got Reading All Wrong: Relearning How to Read
    • How Most People Read
    • Reading Is a Useless Word: The Many Kinds of Reading
    • On Non-Linear Reading
      • Reading As Iteration
      • Non-Linear Reading: Case Studies
    • Speed Reading is Dead
      • 80/20 Scan
    • Books as Networks
      • Networking / Associative Reading
      • Conversation vs Indoctrination
  • Reading Deeply: Going From Passive to Active
    • The Death & Rebirth of Highlighting
    • Feynman Method
    • Brain Dump: Active Reading Techniques
    • Brain Dump #2
  • Remembering What You Read: Beyond the Book
    • Forgetting Curves & Spaced Repetition
  • Choosing Reading Material
  • Applying What You Read
  • Reading More
    • Positive Feedback & The Boredom Filter
      • Establish the Process First
    • What Is Possible?
    • Finding Time to Read
    • Create Positive Affordances
  • On Implementation
  • Resources
  • Untitled
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. We've Got Reading All Wrong: Relearning How to Read
  2. Speed Reading is Dead

80/20 Scan

PreviousSpeed Reading is DeadNextBooks as Networks

Last updated 7 years ago

From :

The next most enduringly useful "off-syllabus" thing I learned is how to do an "80/20 Scan" of any non-fiction books for research/quick learning purposes. The idea is to get 80% of the useful information a book has to offer by spending a short period of time with it. Basically a collection of tips (e.g. always read the preface to the book as it is basically instruction on how to read the book for various purposes and tells you what you can ignore, find one thing in the book you already know well and use that to gauge the credibility of the source, skim chapter subtitles, figures and tables first then read in depth, read the ends of the chapters first because that is usually a summary of what was said, etc.). Doesn't replace deep reading, but ensures your deep reading is most efficient if all you are seeking is information.

This also follows the idea that concept-density isn't uniformly distributed across the book/paper, and you should spend different amounts of time on different sections.

An example, from someone in the social sciences (via )

I focus heavily on the abstract and introduction, skim lit review (you might want to familiarize yourself more with this section, if you aren't as knowledgeable about the field, skim methods, skim analyses, and read result/conclusion.

this metafilter thread
MetaFilter